Many audiophiles and HiFi designers believe that a lot has been already said and done in preamplifiers and power amplifiers for HiFi audio.
Not only, but there's a trend (fashion?) to re-discover old schemes and circuits of, say, 30-40 years ago.
I believe that new ideas are always needed and that research in audio designing should never stop and repeat itself.
May you tell our readers something about up-to-date ideas in amplifiers designing?
Everything old is new again!. I don't think that this is a new concept. Every generation always thinks that they have invented the wheel, but obviously they have not.
When it comes to Audio design, there are many ways that an Engineer/Designer can generate a circuit- combinations of technologies, devices and simply novel ways of using these devices.
If I refer to valve design, there really is absolutely nothing new - in fact, most of the super valve preamps are nothing more that a Macintosh C33 with upgraded parts!
Those other designs are copies of oscilloscope differential amplifier inputs, or even basic 'buffer circuits'. Where some of the more clever designers have deviated is to incorporate some modern ideas, i.e. switching mode power supplies, or solid state elements to form a sort of hybrid. But these are legitimate designs because the components of today are very different than those of yesteryear - which also flies in the face of common sense, when you see designers actually 'rolling their own' capacitors in oil. I see all this as 'fun'. There is a certain euphoria when one transplants a technology from the 1920's -a feeling of H.G. Well's TIME MACHINE.
There is nothing wrong with this, as there is nothing wrong with adoring classical art AND modern art. I still enjoy listening to Maria Callas on Edison Cylinders! It transports me back to these simpler times. Some up to date ideas? Well, where do I start! So that I don't bore your readers, I suggest that they have a look at my Web Site at www.metaxas.com.au where this is explained in much detail.
But please note that some major changes are coming. Stay tuned. But to distill my thoughts on design:
Speaking of trends, how do you see the minimalist approach of Japanese and French audiophiles (quickly becoming very popular worldwide) of coupling very low power amplifiers (3-5 watts) with super-high efficency loudspeakers?
Before I answer that, remember that it was a certain 'Gallic-Japanese' Jean Hiraga who started this in Europe (France) through La Nouvelle Revue Du Son. I think that this is a good trend because it is always easier to manufacture/design a low powered amplifier which sounds exceptional than a higher powered one.
The new IKARUS Mk5 takes full advantage of this, and you should try to audition one and compare it directly with a single-ended valve. You will be very surprised!
Also, I think that speakers are simply too inefficient anyway - but not at the loud or macro-end, but the micro-end. It will improve the overall sound of High End if the resolution at low power levels improves - this is the natural advantage of Electrostatics, because even though traditionally they are not efficient and not practical in the 'macro-information' sense - i.e. really loud music, their incredible low-level retrieval allows them to increase the dynamic range at the micro-end.
Also, all designers are starting to realise that in order to improve the overall sound, it is not what happens at the macro-end which is important, but the micro-end.
The noise floor, RF interference etc, have been masking this information. As soon as you clean this end of the dynamic range - voila!
I have been doing this for years because my design tools - GOLDMUND REFERENCE Turntables, STELLAVOX Tape Recorders with B&K microphones allowed this to be heard.
A old wives' tale tells that 60 watts from a solid state amplifier are not equal to 60 watts from a tube amplifier, that is to say, a vacuum tube amplifier sounds somewhat *louder* than a transitors one, for a given power.
What's the real story, according to your experience?
The real story is not the actual power rating, but how the amplifier reacts with the speaker. Most 60W valve amplifiers are simply able to convey more information at lower levels and thus appear more powerful. Also, most solid-state amplifiers still sound awful because the designers don't understand how to use transistors properly, and have never really heard the sound of *reality*. I can almost say that even a bad valve amplifier can sound 'musical', but a bad transistor amplifier sounds like 'a polished turd'.
I have written a lot about the sound of Tubes vs Transistors at my site.
Also, I must add, that many solid-state designers are not nearly as fanatical when it comes to component selection. This is because it is much easier to find normal off-the-shelf low voltage (crappy) components. High voltage components are far more difficult to find, and so they tend to be better made. With solid-state, bad component selection really makes the sound 'compress' and become harsh much more easily.
Why, according to you, are the valve amplifiers all the rage today?
Valve amplifiers (single-ended etc) are the rage because the Chinese (who are probably the biggest consumers) are making zillions of them which you can buy for US$100!!! There is nothing wrong with this as it makes 'valves' more accessible to more people, and hopefully some of these people will head in my direction a few years later.
But not everyone wants to play with their valves or has the time/expertise to do so.
Almost three years ago, I felt odd at the PENTA SHOW because I was probably the only company demonstrating solid-state!
I believe one of the fields of HiFi audio where research and development can seriously make huge differences is loudspeakers design.
Fancy and strange projects aside it seems that loudspeakers haven't changed much in the last 30 years, I mean, the 90% of the market is made of conventional dynamic speakers. Materials have changed but the approach is still the same. How do you see the situation? Is there room for new ideas and designs?
I agree with you. But I am happy to say that a new MAS product about to be released is our "ELECTROSTATIC RIBBON" Patent Pending. This new technology takes electrostatics into new territory. Firstly, the "ER" is almost 6dB more efficient than the equivalent Electrostatic, and does not have the peculiar venetian-blind effect, which all statics have.
I cannot say more about the design except for that it really is a tremendous improvement in this technology. And MAS will be offering elements on an OEM basis to other manufacturers who want to develop hybrids.
One of the most Frequently Asked Questions is related to 3D stereo image creation in standard listening rooms.
Audiophiles complain about how difficult is to create a realistic soundstage with just two speakers and many of them are starting to look at *surround* DSP techniques in order to get what their *stereophonic* system isn't able to give them.
I believe two speakers are *necessary and sufficient* to create a realistic soundstage and that the final result mainly depends on recordings and room acoustics.
What's your opinion on this subject? What should we realistically expect from DSP technologies? Is stereophonic reproduction come to an end?
DSP is not necessary. My entry level IKARUS Integrated amplifier with a pair of minimonitors would dispel the notion that you cannot achieve a holographic effect with stereo.
Mas is well known for making top quality amplifiers and preamplifiers. Now you're making also digital electronics, loudspeakers and cables, may you reveal some secret projects to our readers?
Some new projects which will be released in August 1997 are:
Courtesy by Kostas Metaxas for TNT.
Copyright © 1997 Lucio Cadeddu